Practical Approach to Modeling the Impact of Amorphous Drug Nanoparticles on the Oral Absorption of Poorly Soluble Drugs.

Recently published studies have proposed that amorphous drug nanoparticles in gastrointestinal fluids may be beneficial for the absorption of poorly soluble compounds. Nanosized drug particles are known to provide rapid dissolution rates and, in some instances, a slight increase in solubility. However, in recent studies, the differences observed in vivo could not be explained solely by these attributes. Given the high dose and very low aqueous solubility of the study compounds, rapid equilibration to the drug-saturated solubility in gastrointestinal fluid would occur independent of the presence of nanoparticles. Alternatively, it has been proposed that drug nanoparticles (ca. ≤ 200 to 300 nm) may provide a "shuttle" for drug across the unstirred water layer (UWL) adjacent to the intestinal epithelium, particularly for low solubility/lipophilic compounds where absorption may be largely UWL-limited. This transport mechanism would result in a higher unbound drug concentration at the surface of the epithelium for absorption. This study evaluates this mechanism using a simple modification of the effective permeability to account for the effect of drug nanoparticles diffusing across the UWL. The modification can be made using inputs for solubility and nanoparticle size. The permeability modification was evaluated using three published case studies for amorphous formulations of itraconazole, anacetrapib, and enzalutamide, where the formation of amorphous drug nanoparticles upon dissolution resulted in improved drug absorption. Absorption modeling was performed using GastroPlus to assess the impact of the nanomodified permeability method on the accuracy of model prediction compared to in vivo data. Simulation results were compared to those for baseline simulations using an unmodified effective permeability. The results show good agreement using the nanomodified permeability, which described the data better than the standard baseline predictions. The nanomodified permeability method can be a suitable, fit-for-purpose in silico approach for evaluating or predicting oral absorption of poorly soluble, UWL-limited drugs from formulations that produce a significant number of amorphous drug nanoparticles.

Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Enzalutamide in Healthy Chinese Male Volunteers.

PURPOSE: This open-label, single-dose study evaluated the pharmacokinetic profiles of enzalutamide and its major metabolites and the safety of enzalutamide in healthy, Chinese male volunteers. METHODS: Fourteen volunteers (median age, 28.5 years) received a single oral dose of enzalutamide (160 mg) under fasting conditions on day 1 and were followed for 50 days. Pharmacokinetic profiles were obtained for enzalutamide and its major metabolites, carboxylic acid metabolite (M1; inactive metabolite) and N-desmethyl enzalutamide (M2; active metabolite), on day 1 up to 1176 hours (49 days). Safety data were also collected. FINDINGS: Enzalutamide plasma concentration rapidly increased (median Tmax, 1.5 hours) followed by a slow decrease (mean t½, 90.7 hours). M1 and M2 plasma concentrations increased gradually with a median Tmax of 72.0 and 121 hours, respectively. M1 and M2 mean metabolite-to-parent ratios were 0.2 and 1.3, respectively. Mean AUC0-∞ of enzalutamide plus M2 was 828 µg h/mL versus 368 µg h/mL for enzalutamide alone. Mean t½, maximum concentration, and Tmax of enzalutamide plus M2 were comparable with those of enzalutamide. Drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 4 men (28.6%): 1 each of upper respiratory tract infection, chest discomfort, increased blood bilirubin, and decreased white blood cell count. No deaths or serious treatment-emergent adverse events were observed. IMPLICATIONS: The pharmacokinetic profiles of enzalutamide, M1, M2, and enzalutamide plus M2 in healthy Chinese men were generally consistent with those in white men. No new safety concerns were found. Chinese Clinical Trial Registration identifier: CTR20150635.

RP-HPLC-UV Method for Simultaneous Quantification of Second Generation Non-Steroidal Antiandrogens Along with their Active Metabolites in Mice Plasma: Application to a Pharmacokinetic Study.

A simple, specific and reproducible high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) assay method has been developed and validated for the quantitation of second generation antiandrogens and their active metabolites namely apalutamide, enzalutamide, N-desmethylenzalutamide (active metabolite of enzalutamide), darolutamide and ORM-15341 (active metabolite of darolutamide) in mice plasma. The method involves extraction of apalutamide, enzalutamide, N-desmethylenzalutamide, darolutamide and ORM-15341 along with internal standard (IS) from 100 µL mice plasma through a simple protein precipitation process. The chromatographic analysis was performed on a Waters Alliance HPLC system using a gradient mobile phase (comprising 10 mM ammonium acetate and acetonitrile in a flow-gradient) and X-Terra Phenyl column. The UV detection wave length was set at λmax 250 nm. Apalutamide, enzalutamide, N-desmethylenzalutamide, darolutamide and ORM-15341 and the IS eluted at 13.6, 11.4, 9.68, 6.11, 6.93 and 4.69 min, respectively with a total run time of 15 min. Method validation was performed as per regulatory guidelines and the results met the acceptance criteria. The calibration curve was linear over a concentration range of 209 - 5215 ng/mL (r 2=0.998). The intra- and inter-day precisions were in the range of 0.56-13.5 and 1.04-13.9%, respectively. The validated HPLC method was successfully applied to a pharmacokinetic study in mice.

Relationship between amorphous solid dispersion in vivo absorption and in vitro dissolution: phase behavior during dissolution, speciation, and membrane mass transport.

Enzalutamide is a fast crystallizing, hydrophobic compound that has solubility limited absorption in vivo. Given the low aqueous solubility of this compound, it was of interest to evaluate amorphous formulations in vitro and in vivo. Amorphous solid dispersions (ASD) of enzalutamide were prepared with the hydrophilic polymers, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose acetate succinate (HPMCAS) and copovidone (PVPVA). A side-by-side diffusion cell was developed as an in vitro characterization tool to discriminate enzalutamide ASDs based upon the solute thermodynamic activity achieved during dissolution and its impact on the subsequent membrane transport rates, phase behavior, and drug speciation. The same formulations were then tested in vivo in rats using oral dosing of ASD suspensions. Different levels of plasma exposure were observed between the ASDs, which could be correlated to the phase behaviors of the ASDs following dissolution. Unsurprisingly, ASDs that underwent crystallization show lower plasma exposures. However, differences were also observed between ASDs that dissolved to form nanosized amorphous drug aggregates versus those that dissolved to yield only supersaturated solutions, with the former outperforming the latter in terms of the plasma exposure. These observations highlight the importance of thoroughly understanding the phase behavior of an amorphous formulation following dissolution and the need to discriminate between different types of precipitation, specifically crystallization versus glass liquid phase separation to form nanosized amorphous aggregates.

Enzalutamide and analytical interferences in digoxin assays.

Objective: We report two cases of elevated digoxin plasma levels in patients receiving enzalutamide. Cases reported: The first patient, an 84-year-old male treated with enzalutamide, was hospitalized due to deterioration in his general state. Atrial fibrillation was discovered and treatment with digoxin was initiated. Supratherapeutic digoxin concentrations (4 µg/L and 3.5 µg/L 3 days later) led to treatment being stopped despite the lack of clinical or biological signs of overdose. The second patient, an 84-year-old male treated with digoxin and enzalutamide, was hospitalized for the same reasons. Digoxin concentration upon admission was 2.8 µg/L. Despite stopping treatment, digoxin blood levels were observed to have increased on D3 and D7 following admission (3 and 3.6 µg/L, respectively). However, no clinical or biological findings indicated an overdose. Blood samples were sent to the Pharmacology and Toxicology Laboratory for analysis. Methods: The second patient's digoxin plasma level was determined using the chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA®, Abbott, Illinois) method. Enzalutamide levels were determined using HPLC-UV/DAD method. An interference study was performed using different assay methods by adding enzalutamide to control plasma at various concentrations from a Xtandi® (40mg) capsule. Results: Plasma concentration of digoxin at D7 for patient 2 was identical in both laboratories (3.5 vs. 3.6 µg/L). Enzalutamide was found in the patient's plasma (12,5 mg/L). Adding 4, 10, 20, and 40 mg/L of enzalutamide to the untreated plasma showed that the plasma concentration of digoxin was positive (from 0.35 to 3.69 µg/L) using the CMIA method. Conclusions: Our results highlight the analytical interferences of enzalutamide with digoxin assays using the CMIA method.

Development and Validation of a Bioanalytical Method to Quantitate Enzalutamide and its Active Metabolite N-Desmethylenzalutamide in Human Plasma: Application to Clinical Management of Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Enzalutamide is a potent androgen-signaling receptor inhibitor and is licensed for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. N-desmethylenzalutamide is the active metabolite of enzalutamide. A method to quantitate enzalutamide and its active metabolite was developed and validated according to the European Medicine Agency guidelines. METHODS: Enzalutamide and N-desmethylenzalutamide were extracted by protein precipitation, separated on a C18 column with gradient elution and analyzed with tandem quadrupole mass spectrometry in positive ion mode. A stable deuterated isotope (D6-enzalutamide) was used as an internal standard. The method was tested and stability was studied in real-life patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients treated with enzalutamide. RESULTS: The calibration curve covered the range of 500-50,000 ng/mL. Within- and between-day precisions were <8% and accuracies were within 108% for both enzalutamide and N-desmethylenzalutamide. Precisions for lower limit of quantification level were <10% and accuracies within 116% for enzalutamide and N-desmethylenzalutamide. Enzalutamide and N-desmethylenzalutamide stability was proven for 24 hours for whole blood at ambient temperature and 23 days for plasma at both ambient temperature and 2-8°C. Long-term patient plasma stability was shown for 14 months at -40°C. CONCLUSIONS: This bioanalytical method was successfully validated and applied to determine plasma concentrations of enzalutamide and N-desmethylenzalutamide in clinical studies and in routine patient care.

Post hoc analyses of East Asian patients from the randomized placebo-controlled PREVAIL trial of enzalutamide in patients with chemotherapy-naïve, metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Enzalutamide is an androgen receptor (AR) inhibitor that acts on different steps in the AR signaling pathway. In PREVAIL, an international, phase III, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, enzalutamide significantly reduced the risk of radiographic progression by 81% (hazard ratio [HR], 0.19; P < .0001) and reduced the risk of death by 29% (HR, 0.71; P < .0001) compared with placebo in chemotherapy-naïve men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. METHODS: To evaluate treatment effects, safety, and pharmacokinetics of enzalutamide in East Asian patients from the PREVAIL trial, we performed a post hoc analysis of the Japanese, Korean, and Singaporean patients. PREVAIL enrolled patients with asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic chemotherapy-naïve metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who had progressed on androgen deprivation therapy. During the study, patients received enzalutamide (160 mg/d) or placebo (1:1) until death or discontinuation because of radiographic progression or skeletal-related event and initiation of subsequent therapy. Centrally assessed radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) and overall survival (OS) were coprimary endpoints. The secondary endpoints of the PREVAIL trial were investigator-assessed rPFS, time to initiation of chemotherapy, time to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression, and PSA response (≥50% decline). RESULTS: Of 1717 patients, 148 patients were enrolled at sites in East Asia (enzalutamide 73, placebo 75). Treatment effect of enzalutamide versus placebo was consistent with that for the overall population as indicated by the HRs (95% confidence interval) of 0.38 (0.10-1.44) for centrally assessed rPFS, 0.59 (0.29-1.23) for OS, 0.33 (0.19-0.60) for time to chemotherapy, and 0.32 (0.20-0.50) for time to PSA progression. In East Asian patients, PSA responses were observed in 68.5% and 14.7% of enzalutamide- and placebo-treated patients, respectively. The enzalutamide plasma concentration ratio (East Asian:non-Asian patients) was 1.12 (90% confidence interval, 1.05-1.20) at 13 weeks. Treatment-related adverse events grade ≥ 3 occurred in 1.4% and 2.7% of enzalutamide- and placebo-treated East Asian patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment effects and safety of enzalutamide in East Asian patients were generally consistent with those observed in the overall study population from PREVAIL. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV NUMBER: NCT01212991.

Development and Validation of an LC-MS/MS Method for the Simultaneous Quantification of Abiraterone, Enzalutamide, and Their Major Metabolites in Human Plasma.

BACKGROUND: Abiraterone acetate and enzalutamide are 2 novel drugs for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. The metabolism of these drugs is extensive. Major metabolites are N-desmethyl enzalutamide, enzalutamide carboxylic acid, abiraterone N-oxide sulfate, and abiraterone sulfate; of which N-desmethyl enzalutamide is reported to possess antiandrogen capacities. A liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for simultaneous quantification of abiraterone, enzalutamide, and the main metabolites has been developed and validated to support therapeutic drug monitoring. METHODS: Human plasma samples of patients treated with abiraterone or enzalutamide were harvested at the clinic and stored at -20°C. Proteins were precipitated by acetonitrile, and the final extract was injected on a Kinetex C18 column and separated with gradient elution. Analytes were detected by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (Triple Quad 6500). RESULTS: The method was validated over various linear ranges: 1-100 ng/mL for abiraterone, 5-500 ng/mL for enzalutamide and enzalutamide carboxylic acid, 10-1000 ng/mL for N-desmethyl enzalutamide, 30-3000 ng/mL for abiraterone N-oxide sulfate, and 100-10,000 ng/mL for abiraterone sulfate. Intra-assay and interassay variabilities were within ±15% of the nominal concentrations for quality control samples at medium and high concentrations and within ±20% at the lower limit of quantification, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The described method for simultaneous determination of abiraterone and enzalutamide was validated successfully and provides a useful tool for therapeutic drug monitoring in patients treated with these agents.

Simultaneous quantitation of abiraterone, enzalutamide, N-desmethyl enzalutamide, and bicalutamide in human plasma by LC-MS/MS.

Inhibiting the androgen receptor (AR) pathway is an important clinical strategy in metastatic prostate cancer. Novel agents including abiraterone acetate and enzalutamide have been shown to prolong life in men with metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). To evaluate the pharmacokinetics of AR-targeted agents, we developed and validated an LC-MS/MS assay for the quantitation of enzalutamide, N-desmethyl enzalutamide, abiraterone and bicalutamide in 0.05mL human plasma. After protein precipitation, chromatographic separation was achieved with a Phenomenex Synergi Polar-RP column and a linear gradient of 0.1% formic acid in methanol and water. Detection with an ABI 4000Q mass spectrometer utilized electrospray ionization in positive multiple reaction monitoring mode. The assay was linear over the ranges of 1-1000ng/mL for abiraterone and bicalutamide and 100-30,000ng/mL for N-desmethyl enzalutamide and enzalutamide and proved to be accurate (92.8-107.7%) and precise (largest was 15.3% CV at LLOQ for bicalutamide), and fulfilled FDA criteria for bioanalytical method validation. We demonstrated the suitability of this assay in plasma from patients who were administered enzalutamide 160mg, abiraterone 1000mg and bicalutamide 50mg once a day as monotherapy or in combination. The LC-MS/MS assay that has been developed will be an essential tool that further defines the pharmacology of the combinations of androgen synthesis or AR-receptor targeted agents.

Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, and Excretion of the Androgen Receptor Inhibitor Enzalutamide in Rats and Dogs.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Enzalutamide is an androgen receptor inhibitor that has been approved in several countries. Absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) data in animals would facilitate understanding of the efficacy and safety profiles of enzalutamide, but little information has been reported in public. The purpose of this study was to clarify the missing ADME profile in animals. METHODS: ADME of 14C-enzalutamide after oral administration as Labrasol solution were investigated in non-fasted male Sprague-Dawley rats and beagle dogs. RESULTS: Plasma concentrations of 14C-enzalutamide peaked in rats and dogs at 6-8 h after a single oral administration. In most tissues, radioactivity concentration peaked at 4 h after administration. Excluding the gastrointestinal tract, tissues with the highest concentration of radioactivity were liver, fat, and adrenal glands. The tissue concentrations of radioactivity declined below the limit of quantitation or <0.89 % of maximum concentration by 168 h post-dose. Two known metabolites (M1 and M2) and at least 15 novel possible metabolites were detected in this study. M1 was the most abundant metabolite in both rats and dogs. Unchanged drug was a minor component in excreta. In intact rats, the mean urinary and fecal excretion of radioactivity accounted for 44.20 and 49.80 % of administered radioactivity, respectively. In intact dogs, mean urinary and fecal excretion was 62.00 and 22.30 % of the administered radioactivity, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Rapid oral absorption was observed in rats and dogs when 14C-enzalutamide was administered as Labrasol solution. Tissue distribution in rats was clarified. The elimination of enzalutamide is mediated primarily by metabolism. Species differences were observed in excretion route.

The PREVAIL trial of enzalutamide in men with chemotherapy-naïve, metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: Post hoc analysis of Korean patients.

PURPOSE: This post hoc analysis evaluated treatment effects, safety, and pharmacokinetics of enzalutamide in Korean patients in the phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled PREVAIL trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic chemotherapy-naive men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer that progressed on androgen deprivation therapy received 160 mg/d oral enzalutamide or placebo (1:1) until death or discontinuation due to radiographic progression or skeletal-related event and initiation of subsequent therapy. Coprimary end points were centrally assessed radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary end points included investigator-assessed rPFS, time to initiation of chemotherapy, time to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression, PSA response (≥50% decline), and time to skeletal-related event. RESULTS: Of 1,717 total patients, 78 patients were enrolled in Korea (enzalutamide, n=40; placebo, n=38). Hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) for enzalutamide versus placebo were 0.23 (0.02-2.24) for centrally assessed rPFS, 0.77 (0.28-2.15) for OS, 0.21 (0.08-0.51) for time to chemotherapy, and 0.31 (0.17-0.56) for time to PSA progression. A PSA response was observed in 70.0% of enzalutamide-treated and 10.5% of placebo-treated Korean patients. Adverse events of grade ≥3 occurred in 33% of enzalutamide-treated and 11% of placebo-treated Korean patients, with median treatment durations of 13.0 and 5.1 months, respectively. At 13 weeks, the plasma concentration of enzalutamide plus N-desmethyl enzalutamide was similar in Korean and non-Korean patients (geometric mean ratio, 1.04; 90% confidence interval, 0.97-1.10). CONCLUSIONS: In Korean patients, treatment effects and safety of enzalutamide were consistent with those observed in the overall PREVAIL study population (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01212991).

Clinical Pharmacokinetic Studies of Enzalutamide.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Oral enzalutamide (160 mg once daily) is approved for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). This article describes the pharmacokinetics of enzalutamide and its active metabolite N-desmethyl enzalutamide. METHODS: Results are reported from five clinical studies. RESULTS: In a dose-escalation study (n = 140), enzalutamide half-life was 5.8 days, steady state was achieved by day 28, accumulation was 8.3-fold, exposure was approximately dose proportional from 30-360 mg/day, and intersubject variability was ≤30 %. In a mass balance study (n = 6), enzalutamide was primarily eliminated by hepatic metabolism. Renal excretion was an insignificant elimination pathway for enzalutamide and N-desmethyl enzalutamide. In a food-effect study (n = 60), food did not have a meaningful effect on area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of enzalutamide or N-desmethyl enzalutamide, and in an hepatic impairment study, AUC of the sum of enzalutamide plus N-desmethyl enzalutamide was similar in men with mild (n = 6) or moderate (n = 8) impairment (Child-Pugh Class A and B) versus men with normal hepatic function (n = 14). In a phase III trial, an exposure-response analysis of steady-state predose (trough) concentrations (C trough) versus overall survival (n = 1103) showed that active treatment C trough quartiles for 160 mg/day were uniformly beneficial relative to placebo, and no threshold of C trough was associated with a statistically significant better response. CONCLUSIONS: Enzalutamide has predictable pharmacokinetics, with low intersubject variability. Similar efficacy was observed in patients across the concentration/exposure range associated with a fixed oral dose of enzalutamide 160 mg/day.

Quantitative determination of enzalutamide, an anti-prostate cancer drug, in rat plasma using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, and its application to a pharmacokinetic study.

This report details a method using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) that allows one to determine the concentration of an atypical anticancer drug, enzalutamide, in rat plasma. Specifically, this method involves the addition of an acetonitrile and bicalutamide (internal standard) solution to plasma samples. Following centrifugation of this mixture, an aliquot of the supernatant was directly injected into the LC-MS/MS system. Separation was achieved using a column packed with octadecylsilica (5 µm, 2.1 × 50 mm) with 10 mM ammonium acetate in acetonitrile as the mobile phase; detection was accomplished using MS/MS by multiple-reaction monitoring via an electrospray ionization source. This method demonstrated a linear standard curve (r = 0.997) over a concentration range of 0.001-1 µg/mL, as well as an intra- and inter-assay precision of 2.7 and 5.1%, respectively, and an accuracy range from 100.8 to 105.6%. The lower limit of quantification was 1.0 ng/mL in 50 µL of rat plasma sample. We also demonstrated that this analytical method could be successfully applied to the pharmacokinetic study of enzalutamide in rats.

Validation of a method for quantifying enzalutamide and its major metabolites in human plasma by LC-MS/MS.

BACKGROUND: Enzalutamide is an androgen receptor inhibitor that targets multiple steps in the androgen receptor signaling pathway. Oral enzalutamide was recently approved by the US FDA and health authorities in other regions for the treatment of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who previously received docetaxel. The objective of this study was to validate a method for quantification of enzalutamide and its two major metabolites in human plasma. RESULTS: The analytes were extracted from plasma by an LLE procedure, separated by reversed phase HPLC and detected by MS/MS in positive mode ESI. The quantitation range was 0.0200-50.0 µg/ml. CONCLUSION: The method proved to be rapid and simple, and met FDA validation criteria.

ARN-509: a novel antiandrogen for prostate cancer treatment.

Continued reliance on the androgen receptor (AR) is now understood as a core mechanism in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), the most advanced form of this disease. While established and novel AR pathway-targeting agents display clinical efficacy in metastatic CRPC, dose-limiting side effects remain problematic for all current agents. In this study, we report the discovery and development of ARN-509, a competitive AR inhibitor that is fully antagonistic to AR overexpression, a common and important feature of CRPC. ARN-509 was optimized for inhibition of AR transcriptional activity and prostate cancer cell proliferation, pharmacokinetics, and in vivo efficacy. In contrast to bicalutamide, ARN-509 lacked significant agonist activity in preclinical models of CRPC. Moreover, ARN-509 lacked inducing activity for AR nuclear localization or DNA binding. In a clinically valid murine xenograft model of human CRPC, ARN-509 showed greater efficacy than MDV3100. Maximal therapeutic response in this model was achieved at 30 mg/kg/d of ARN-509, whereas the same response required 100 mg/kg/d of MDV3100 and higher steady-state plasma concentrations. Thus, ARN-509 exhibits characteristics predicting a higher therapeutic index with a greater potential to reach maximally efficacious doses in man than current AR antagonists. Our findings offer preclinical proof of principle for ARN-509 as a promising therapeutic in both castration-sensitive and castration-resistant forms of prostate cancer.